Does it really exist? Prove it!

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by frankhardy

First of all, no corrected Pujols. Polanco is on the back.

PSA has graded 48 of the "corrected" cards. I have a hard time believing they got it wrong that many times.
https://www.psacard.com/pop/baseball...02/topps/49718

[frankhardy]

Originally Posted by swarmee

PSA has graded 48 of the "corrected" cards. I have a hard time believing they got it wrong that many times.
https://www.psacard.com/pop/baseball...02/topps/49718

It is my opinion that the "corrected" version on the pop report is actually all of the ones graded before the discovery. I am fairly sure of this because I actually sent one in to PSA early on and it did not say "corrected" or "Polanco back". I think after the discovery was made, they transferred all of the data from the cards graded before the discovery to the "corrected" back. Just a theory, but I really think that is what happened.

As for the 10% run.....you would certainly think that one would surface.

[ALR-bishop]

I have asked both here and on CU for some time for anyone who has one to post it. So far no one has. It was included in the last SCD Standard Catalog that included post 1980 listings which makes me think Lemke thought he saw one, or was told about it

[quitcrab]

How about a 1969 Rawling promo Reggie Jackson or Mickey Mantle?

[Bestdj777]

Originally Posted by quitcrab

How about a 1969 Rawling promo Reggie Jackson or Mickey Mantle?

I've seen two Mantles. They were listed on eBay within a couple weeks of each other. A member picked up the first and tipped me off to the second. I could justify the $1,500 price tag, or whatever, without knowing for 100% certain it was real, which I couldn't as none have been graded.

[Bestdj777]

http://www.net54baseball.com/attachm...5&d=1458596663

Mantle

[Bestdj777]

Link to the thread with the Reggie and Mantle:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=219905

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by frankhardy

It is my opinion that the "corrected" version on the pop report is actually all of the ones graded before the discovery. I am fairly sure of this because I actually sent one in to PSA early on and it did not say "corrected" or "Polanco back". I think after the discovery was made, they transferred all of the data from the cards graded before the discovery to the "corrected" back. Just a theory, but I really think that is what happened.

I know nothing about the Pujols card, but the scenario you put forward makes perfect sense in general. Case in point, there are so many 1962 'green tints' that reside in normal slabs, because they were graded before PSA started differentiating between the two variations.