NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2017, 01:16 PM
Jobu's Avatar
Jobu Jobu is offline
Bry@n
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 3,784
Default How do you remove a photo from a mount?

I have a mounted Jim Thorpe photo and am wondering if anyone can shed some light on the process of removing a photo like this from its mount. The board is too thick to see through with a strong light, so I don't have any idea if something is written/stamped on the back. Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Thorpe c.jpg (73.4 KB, 201 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2017, 01:20 PM
drcy's Avatar
drcy drcy is offline
David Ru.dd Cycl.eback
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,484
Default

I'd leave it as is. The photo is more desirable on a mount like that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2017, 01:37 PM
Jobu's Avatar
Jobu Jobu is offline
Bry@n
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 3,784
Default

Interesting. I am still learning about what is important for vintage photos, but I thought that being able to see the back, for both stamps/writing and paper type, was really important.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2017, 02:06 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcy View Post
I'd leave it as is. The photo is more desirable on a mount like that.
+1 Curiosity killed the cat...and ruined the Thorpe photo.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2017, 10:55 AM
Jobu's Avatar
Jobu Jobu is offline
Bry@n
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 3,784
Default

Thanks guys.

One more question - is there any risk of damage to a photo from a mount that isn't acid free? I have been thinking about this and can't think of examples of photos where an old mount appears to have damaged a real photo. Obviously cards, posters, ads, etc all suffer, but do photos? I also have another old team panoramic photo still on its original mount and the photo looks just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2017, 11:09 AM
Huysmans Huysmans is offline
Br.ent So.bie
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,022
Default

Hey Bryan,

as others have stated, I'd leave the photo as is.
Very little could be gained by removing it with damage a possibility, plus the reverse of the mount does have editorial notes and stamps.

Regarding possible damage to the photo from the mount itself, the overwhelming majority of photos from the era and earlier, if on contemporary mounts, are in no fear of any acid damage.

... great image by the way!

Last edited by Huysmans; 12-28-2017 at 11:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2017, 11:32 AM
drcy's Avatar
drcy drcy is offline
David Ru.dd Cycl.eback
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobu View Post
Thanks guys.

One more question - is there any risk of damage to a photo from a mount that isn't acid free? I have been thinking about this and can't think of examples of photos where an old mount appears to have damaged a real photo. Obviously cards, posters, ads, etc all suffer, but do photos? I also have another old team panoramic photo still on its original mount and the photo looks just fine.
That is a legitimate point, but all mounted photos (ala cabinet cards) had the photo pasted on and there is rarely any damage from that. And most damaged would have happened by now.

If the photo was pasted later on to something, I think removal would be a legitimate idea. However, the backing is original to it, I'd leave it as is.

P.s., it's an grade A photo.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2017, 12:20 AM
prewarsports prewarsports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,553
Default

I'm guessing you probably wont find anything on the back of that photo that is going to make you happy. The style and markings on it appear to be more modern (maybe 1950's or 1960's) and I would leave it as is, it makes for a really nice display and if my hunch is correct about it being a little later, the glue on back would make it nearly impossible to remove and you are going to regret messing with it. Of course I could never speak absolutely without seeing it in person, but my guess is that it is a larger image on glossier paper stock that dates to after WWII but still looks great as is, leave it.
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2017, 11:04 AM
Jobu's Avatar
Jobu Jobu is offline
Bry@n
member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 3,784
Default

Thanks again for the honest opinions.

The photo itself measures 9" x 7". I just compared it to my 1917 Cobb military photo and the Thorpe may be a little less glossy than that one. Any tips on what I might look for to date it short of waiting for the National to be back in Chicago?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-02-2018, 10:21 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,229
Default

I have a few photos that were mounted to non-acid free mounts, and in general, the photos are fine. The exceptions are a couple on really bad mounts where the mount cracked under the photo and damaged the photo with it.

But those are also 100+ years old, so you've got a long way to go.

I really have to make scans of some of that stuff.

I'd also think the photo and mount are newer than the 1920's.

The fun thing to do would be to see if that photo is on p59 of a book, or maybe a bit after since they also re-wrote the date. Finding what that exact photo was used for would be pretty cool.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB T5 Pinkerton cardboard mount sans photo T206Jim Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 08-11-2015 07:39 PM
What is the best way to remove a photo glued to paper? toyman55 Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 0 09-24-2014 08:59 AM
Large Ted Williams Original Photo on Mount Archive Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 0 01-24-2009 06:35 PM
How to remove sticky-tabs from photo Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 03-10-2008 02:24 PM
Advice please, removing photo mount....... Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 07-27-2007 10:33 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.


ebay GSB