NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2017, 12:17 AM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default 1920's Babe Ruth studio photo

I just recently picked this up but was hoping to get more info on it. Its not the thin ones I see in auctions but this one is sepia toned on double weight paper. Not glossy at all. Definitely looks period. Anyone seen one before?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2017, 12:24 AM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

here's the back

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2017, 09:56 AM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,190
Default

I believe its the same picture photo used on the Babe Ruth Club Green Duck pin. From the 30s
__________________
The speed of light is faster that the speed of sound that is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

Trying is the first step towards failing, and failing is the first step towards success!

Life's lessons cost money Some lessons cost a lot..

Last edited by batsballsbases; 12-28-2017 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2017, 10:44 AM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

I found this one but definitely different. Also notice the placement of the auto


Last edited by JoeyFarino; 04-07-2017 at 10:44 AM. Reason: add photo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:24 PM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,190
Default

Also note that the autographs are different note the "E" in Babe on both photos among other differences.
__________________
The speed of light is faster that the speed of sound that is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

Trying is the first step towards failing, and failing is the first step towards success!

Life's lessons cost money Some lessons cost a lot..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:33 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

I cant find any other sepia toned examples anywhere. Wondering if the one i have is a studio example and then changed to the other version I posted
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:33 PM
David Atkatz's Avatar
David Atkatz David Atkatz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batsballsbases View Post
Also note that the autographs are different note the "E" in Babe on both photos among other differences.
The reason for that is quite simple. The second photo was signed by Ruth. The first was not.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:38 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Atkatz View Post
The reason for that is quite simple. The second photo was signed by Ruth. The first was not.
Ya the first is definitely secretarial but I think this mightve been a rough copy to see how they wanted it to look in the end.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:51 PM
David Atkatz's Avatar
David Atkatz David Atkatz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,099
Default

Here's my signed sepia version:

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2017, 05:08 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Atkatz View Post
Here's my signed sepia version:

Very nice...the style I have was included in the underwear box but only in a limited amount
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-09-2017, 09:27 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

Here's a comparison on both. The one on the left is the one that came in some of the underwear boxes. The one on the right is mine

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-10-2017, 12:42 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,534
Default

And there's your explanation. Apeda was a commercial photographer whose work was commissioned and also licensed and sold. Very desirable photo studio, but the years of mfg would need to be researched, because Apeda used images for years after they were taken. This Jack Dempsey was taken in the early 1920s but made to be handed out to coast guard sailors who completed his self-defense course in WW2 (and yes, the signature is good):



I would assume that the Apeda Ruth you show is a studio photo (great one BTW) that was licensed for use with the undies.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-17-2017, 02:18 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

So I found another example taken by Sussman studios. Same exact pose. Also found this article about Apeda studios



Apeda's primary advantage among the New York metropolitan studios was its possession of industrial photograph developers and postcard printers. Whenever a New York photographer took a shot that they could not reproduce and market themselves or took a photograph that could not be copyrighted because there was no contract between photographer and sitter (the situation of flashlight stills of Broadway plays for instance), Apeda would secure a print, eradicate whatever name or trademark appeared on the print and affixed their own Apeda signature.

Last edited by JoeyFarino; 04-17-2017 at 02:19 PM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-17-2017, 03:22 PM
D. Bergin's Avatar
D. Bergin D. Bergin is online now
Dave
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 6,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyFarino View Post
So I found another example taken by Sussman studios. Same exact pose. Also found this article about Apeda studios



Apeda's primary advantage among the New York metropolitan studios was its possession of industrial photograph developers and postcard printers. Whenever a New York photographer took a shot that they could not reproduce and market themselves or took a photograph that could not be copyrighted because there was no contract between photographer and sitter (the situation of flashlight stills of Broadway plays for instance), Apeda would secure a print, eradicate whatever name or trademark appeared on the print and affixed their own Apeda signature.

I'd wager "Sussman", which was based in Minnesota, was guilty of ripping off from Apeda in this instance.

Your version looks like the cleanest version of them all. Too bad it has that secretarial/forged signature on it, mussing it up.

What size is it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2017, 03:43 PM
JoeyFarino JoeyFarino is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Bergin View Post
I'd wager "Sussman", which was based in Minnesota, was guilty of ripping off from Apeda in this instance.

Your version looks like the cleanest version of them all. Too bad it has that secretarial/forged signature on it, mussing it up.

What size is it?
Its 8x10. I just can't find any like it anywhere
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Babe Ruth 1920 Original Snapshot Photo (Batting Practice at Polo Grounds) For Sale Billyscards Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 9 08-27-2016 01:07 PM
EARLY 1920's Babe Ruth children notepad. Great image of a young Ruth sporteq Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 0 10-22-2015 03:16 PM
1920's Babe Ruth RRPC - SGC 50 pencil1974 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 05-25-2015 08:08 AM
FS:R315 Babe Ruth,1920 W516 BABE RUTH, Mathewson 1927 York Walter Johnson,Hoyt ROOKIE vintagehofrookies 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 23 03-20-2015 05:36 PM
SOLD: 1920 Type II Photo - Babe Ruth @ 3 Years-Old (c1898) BGS bcbgcbrcb Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 5 09-26-2011 04:23 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.


ebay GSB