|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
If the bidders risk buying the item it doesn't matter what bid increment they use or how often they bid. The retraction is the sin here. It allows the bidder to fish for the high bid with no risk of getting stuck with the card. That is why 25 strikes is asinine, fake pseudo-security. I mean that's "my toddler BINed my entire watch list" level error.
If the purpose of these changes is to stop shill bidding it won't work. If I represented a class of aggrieved card buyers suing PWCC for unfair trade practices that 25 number would need to be explained and I don't think it would go over well.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 10-10-2016 at 07:33 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
psa pwcc..hi bidder.r u kidding me? | sflayank | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 09-04-2016 03:42 PM |
eBay buyer wants money back--policy? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-31-2015 05:38 AM |
A Question concerning Ebay's Buyer Protection Policy -- seeking some advice :) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-06-2013 05:40 PM |
New eBay Bidder Policy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 01-16-2007 06:58 PM |
Question about Ebay's Non-Paying Bidder Policy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-06-2003 06:17 PM |