Wen is enough PSA Shame on you!!!

[mybestbretts]

We hear it all the time, but this is really bad.
I sent in a 30 day grading to PSA dated April 9th. This was on a 30 day turnaround. I don't have it yet.
They received it on April 11.
Put into the system on May 8th.
I paid $17.00 a card for the 30 day special
I still don't have the cards.
PSA says it will be about 2 more weeks because of "the convention", BUT
they reduced my fee to $10.00 a card. BIG DEAL that's the bulk rate card price which is what I am getting anyway. No accommodation there.
What a way to treat long time customers.

[mybestbretts]

Sorry about that WHEN

[Johnny630]

Bottom line they don’t care.

The reason they do not care is because of their registry and pop repot, people think this is the money/golden ticket commodity.

Check out there line at the National it will be outta control. The others will look much different.

I agree with you, it’s not a good way treat a long term customer. Hang in there sir.

[hcv123]

I can't even get back into all the stories of read as well as a handful I experienced - last post hit it on the head. As long as they have the registry and people interested in competing on it - they will get away with poor service.

[JollyElm]

Speaking of the registry, you know what's funny? There's a member here (I assume it's him because the name is an exact match) who is a part of a certain master set registry and it says his set is 100% complete. However, and this is a big freakin' HOWEVER, the only reason his set is 'complete' is because he has a rare card that PSA mislabeled as the variation (The reason I know this is because I saw it on ebay awhile back and laughed that PSA really messed that one up. I then downloaded the auction image to keep it on file. It's sad, but I knew someone was going to buy it cheaply and use it for nefarious reasons.) when it is, in fact, the normal version of the card. It's graded a 9 and is (WRONGLY!!!) a pop of 1, the highest graded version of the card. Not only that, when you look at his set and click the image of said card, he friggin' blatantly photoshopped the image to try to make it appear like the variation. It's laughable!! (And yes, the serial numbers of the two cards mentioned here are the same.) Just a complete lack of integrity.

Is there a person at PSA who is in charge of maintaining the registries? Man, I'd love to drop him or her a note.

[vintagetoppsguy]

You answered your own question with your first statement..."We hear it all the time..." If you hear it all the time, why do you continue to submit to them?

[Leon]

Now that is amusing.

Originally Posted by JollyElm

Speaking of the registry, you know what's funny? There's a member here (I assume it's him because the name is an exact match) who is a part of a certain master set registry and it says his set is 100% complete. However, and this is a big freakin' HOWEVER, the only reason his set is 'complete' is because he has a rare card that PSA mislabeled as the variation (The reason I know this is because I saw it on ebay awhile back and laughed that PSA really messed that one up. I then downloaded the auction image to keep it on file. It's sad, but I knew someone was going to buy it cheaply and use it for nefarious reasons.) when it is, in fact, the normal version of the card. It's graded a 9 and is (WRONGLY!!!) a pop of 1, the highest graded version of the card. Not only that, when you look at his set and click the image of said card, he friggin' blatantly photoshopped the image to try to make it appear like the variation. It's laughable!! (And yes, the serial numbers of the two cards mentioned here are the same.) Just a complete lack of integrity.

Is there a person at PSA who is in charge of maintaining the registries? Man, I'd love to drop him or her a note.