Major Fails by PSA and Probstein

[Bliggity]

Major fail.

PSA slabs this as an E92 Mathewson Croft's Cocoa. A true rarity, with only 4 graded by PSA. This one is EX/5, Pop 1, none higher. The best PSA Cocoa Mathewson ever.

Problem is, it's an E92 Dockman. There are more than eight times as many PSA E92 Dockman Mathewsons, including six 5s, four 6s, one 7, and one 8.

Probstein then hypes it as a Pop 1, none higher, and refers to it multiple times as an E92 "Croft's Cola." Which isn't a thing.

[Stonepony]

I wish it was a Crofts Cocoa ......
You're right, all around botch, lol

[CMIZ5290]

Good luck on getting it changed by Probstein or Ebay...

[conor912]

Boy, that card's looking pretty loosey-goosey in that slab.

[glynparson]

Data entry errors don't get me in a huff like they do many on here.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by glynparson

Data entry errors don't get me in a huff like they do many on here.

Yeah, but it does bother me when Probstein calls it "1 only with none higher."

He took the time to look up the pop report, but not the time to turn the card over?

[irv]

Originally Posted by glynparson

Data entry errors don't get me in a huff like they do many on here.

It's over $1,800 already.