|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
52 Mantle - Authentic or Fake?
So I came across this and wondering if it is authentic or fake? It is the Type A Mantle
Wanted to get others thoughts who are more experienced than I |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If a 52 Topps Mantle has a bit of wear, I can usually venture a decent guess as to whether it is authentic. I am far from an expert when they are this clean, as I just do not know the intricacies. That said, I would not feel comfortable with this card. To me, it looks like it was just printed.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Doesn't look good to me.
__________________
My website with current cards http://syckscards.weebly.com Always looking for 1938 Goudey's |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fake
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mantle
The scan is not very helpful. Is this a card you have, or one someone is offering to you ?
If you have it, just get it graded or see if someone like Levi Bleam will take a look at it for you. If someone is offering it to you, it makes no sense that the seller would not have a card that looked that good, if authentic, graded first |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
IMO looks a bit fishy, with red flags (ungraded, bad photos), but some big things like the black border alignment and Yankee logo look good. Would a chance to take it out of that top loader for a closer look/feel
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know much about 52T. How can you tell it's a fake from that pic alone.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe just my failing eyesight, but does the card not have untypically wide borders, both front and back?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
wish it was on ascanner, plus the sleeve makes it hard. I say FAKE.
The black outlines dont look right. Plus what looks like water stains, cant tell if background is blue/green tinting. As for the back, i was only aware the black stiching area was the only dark area, looks like the stats area is the same darkness. Other than that, theres not much i really can see from those bad pics.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Fake. And a card like that?...all my cards are raw and I'm not even a raw v holder stickler...but if I were selling it I wouldn't shove it in a banged up scratched toploader. Also, and I can't really tell w/o a Luckey (hi Leon) quarter, but I don't think that loader is the proper size for a 52T, more like later 50's, and beyond, cards -- in other words, the top of the card would be sticking out the top of the toploader. for a Topps. And believe me, I have enough of them sticking out, which is my personal laziness, but not what I would do with a card like that, were it real. Last edited by Paul S; 03-14-2014 at 05:08 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
52 Mantle
The border on the back has too large a gap on the top AND the bottom. All my 52's I looked at have small borders on the top and bottom if they are centered, and if they are not centered and have one larger border, then the opposite is very small or non existent.
I couldn't tell if it is real or fake without actually seeing the card in person, but I would be leery, very leery. Is this an online transaction? Do you live near each other to check it out in person? Is the asking price as high as it should be for such a nice card or is the seller "giving you a break" on the price? Nothing like the feel test. Also the 50s Topps cards have a pretty distinct smell. Just my 2 cents...
__________________
Always ready to do some old fashioned trading!!! Send me a message if you want to get a trade going. Currently working on: 53 Topps, 61 Topps, 52-55 Redman, 47-66 Exhibits, 53 Bowman color, 52 Topps, 51-55 Bowman, 64 Topps Stand Ups My trading page: http://natesbaseballcardtradingco.weebly.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Card looks fake.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Here's what the back of one should look like (off eBay) next to the back of the one in question. It is clearly NOT real.
Last edited by bobsbbcards; 03-15-2014 at 04:52 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Back- fake
Ok, that one sold me.
If within reasonable driving distance, I'm still all for seeing it in person. If nothing else, will help to identify anything that might give it away (thickness, feel, visible pixels, etc). |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I still can't tell the difference. Can you educate me?
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Authentic or Fake? 1888 Goodwin Champions Bob Caruthers | esd70433 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-04-2011 08:12 PM |
Authentic or Fake? You be the judge | Moesalty | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 139 | 08-24-2011 02:49 PM |
Please help with 52 Mantle, is it authentic? | bm8825 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-06-2010 04:46 PM |
Signed Mickey Mantle Book - 100% Authentic Mantle Autograph - Price Reduced | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 04-19-2009 07:41 PM |
Authentic or fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-11-2006 08:50 PM |