 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-25-2013, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Do you consider this a legit variation
Here are two Boots Day cards
One with a light stantion in the background and one without. Your thoughts? [IMG] ![1971 Topps #42B - Boots Day no lights [Good to VG‑EX] - Courtesy of COMC.com](http://img.comc.com/original/9fcbf8d6-392d-4ceb-a83e-b002b89c0626.jpg) [/IMG]
|
|
#2
09-25-2013, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I see the stantion in both cards, although in the top card it is much more faded. What I'm more interested about is the .COM in his signature. He must have been ahead of his time!
|
|
#3
09-25-2013, 06:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's on both cards IMO.
That's a seller's variation. 
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years."
|
|
#5
09-25-2013, 06:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMO it looks like it may be a poor attempt to remove the light tower. While it may never be recognized in publications as a listed variation I think it's a good find none the less and if something similar were found with a Dodgers player on it I would be a buyer.
__________________
COLLECTING BROOKLYN DODGERS & SUPERBAS
|
|
#6
09-25-2013, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Variant
This card has been offered as a variation on ebay for some time. I personally think it does qualify as a variation in that in later runs I think Topps intentionally tried to reduce or eliminate the object. You can find some cards where it is even less visible. The same effort occurred in the Northup card from this set. That card can be found with a large blob on the front, a smaller blob and a speck
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this a legit variation?? | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-20-2013 01:01 PM |
| Is the Nodgrass considered a legit variation? | Jason | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-12-2012 05:25 AM |
| T206 Dahlen No Red - Legit Variation? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-28-2010 09:36 PM |
| Legit? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-02-2009 12:56 PM |
| Does it look legit?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-19-2002 01:40 PM |
Hybrid Mode
