 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-12-2015, 12:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
1952 Topps 1-310, is it considered complete?
Because of the tough high numbers do you consider 1952 Topps 1-310 Complete (Just the low series) providing you want to stop it at that and are satisfied with that.
If I ever collect this set, thats probably the route I would go. Not so much of the J.Robinson, Campenella, Mantle, but the high number commons, $100 a piece for low grade commons is probably what would turn me off. For comparison would you be happier and feel like you accomplished something by completing 1-310 in 1952 Topps, or would a 1953, 1954 COMPLETE set be more satisfying to you. Who here is just going after 1-310 and then calling it complete? In contrast, who is going for 1-407?
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps complete set | robsbessette | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 71 | 04-09-2014 04:25 PM |
| WTB Complete Set of 1952 Topps Look-N-See | 25801wv | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 07-24-2013 10:09 AM |
| Anyone here building a complete 1952 Topps set? | Zone91 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 05-23-2013 04:05 PM |
| FS: 1952 Topps Near Complete (274) Low Number Set All PSA Graded GPA 5.13 | t206kid | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-21-2013 09:46 AM |
| So what is really considered having the complete set? T-206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-18-2008 11:45 AM |
Threaded Mode