|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: dan mckee
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: Greg Ecklund
Same photo that is on every BF2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: Steve Murray
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: D. Bergin
I think the question is: Do BF2's use Real Photo types or Printed Photo Types? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: dan mckee
Yes that was what I was trying to ask. My Walter Johnson that was removed from a sewn togehter blanket doesn't have this dot pattern. Dan. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: D. Bergin
What if you look at it under a loupe. Some scanners really exaggerate the dot pattern on printed photos and make them look worse then they are. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: dan mckee
Yes I will try that tonight, hopefully you are correct. I just remember a bunch of these recently being sold on ebay w/o the pictures attached. Dan. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: Greg Ecklund
Sorry Dan...misread your question. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is this photo original??
Posted By: Randall Adams
Those are my BF2's, here is a better scan of the Weaver. |
|
|