NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:01 PM
mintacular's Avatar
mintacular mintacular is offline
Patrick N.
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,919
Default At what point...

did the worth of the cardboard baseball card actually trump the value of the actual product being sold (gum, cigarette, candy, etc.)? Thank you
__________________
My First YouTube Video:
https://youtu.be/1nW2r1NgdOA

Last edited by mintacular; 01-31-2012 at 11:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2012, 11:44 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,082
Default

You mean from the point of view of the consumer, or from the perspective of what - an investor? As a kid ripping open waxpacks in the 1950's, I never even bothered with the gum. It was the cards that I and every other schoolyard twerp wanted. However, as I understand it, around the turn of the last century, the cards were regarded as minor inducements to buy the main product, which was in most cases, tobacco. It seems likely that the relative value to the consumer flipped not long after gum or cheap candy replaced tobacco.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2012, 07:33 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default Cards and Candy

The book The Card by OKeefe and Thompson ( which is mainly about the background of the PSA 8 Wagner cards)has some historical narrative about hobby in general and the use of cards to promote tobacco and confectionary products.

I mentioned in another thread that post war,Topps never had a monopoly or exclusive contracts with players to sell their baseball cards. To avoid anti trust issues their contracts only specified that they had the exclusive right to market the players' likeness with gum/candy/confections. Otherswere free to market cards by themselves or with cookies ( Fleer 63) or marbles (Leaf 61), but Topps at the time seems to have established "the market" as cards and gum.

I agree with Volod that when buying packs as a kid in the late 50s I did not care much about the gum, except for that wonderful and exotic smell when you opened the packs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2012, 08:14 AM
bn2cardz's Avatar
bn2cardz bn2cardz is offline
₳₦ĐɎ ₦ɆɄ฿ɆⱤ₮
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,024
Default

http://www.oldcardboard.com/t/t206/I...al-edition.pdf

In the above article by Scot Reader it indicates that for young boys it was happening as early as 1909. On page 15-16 of the above PDF it references an article in a 1909 article “The Small Boy’s Mania" in which it talks about young boys buying packs of cigarettes to obtain the cards then the would peddle the cigarettes.

The entire PDF was an interesting read, but the article was very interesting when I ran across it a while back.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:02 PM
doug.goodman doug.goodman is offline
Doug Goodman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the road again...
Posts: 4,921
Default

My earliest memories of buying packs of Topps cards involves a stack of cards and a stack of gum, then sorting the cards while ignoring the gum.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2012, 01:28 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default Gum

Doug ---you didn't even check to see if any of the gum pieces might have had the image of a famous person on them ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2012, 06:06 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,082
Default

Hmmn, I wonder if I could have walked into a cigar store as an eight-year-old in 1953, plunked down a couple bucks on the counter and bought a pouch of Redman to get the attached cards. Imagine the proprietor wouldn't even have thought twice about making the sale. Ma would really have freaked seeing me spit a big wad, I'll bet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2012, 02:53 PM
Bob Lemke's Avatar
Bob Lemke Bob Lemke is offline
Bob Lemke
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iola, Wis.
Posts: 646
Default

Steve . . .

Red Man wasn't in a pouch in the early 1950s, it was a cardboard box. The card was attached by a waxy paper outer wrapper.
__________________
My (usually) vintage baseball/football card blog: http://boblemke.blogspot.com

Link to my custom cards gallery:
http://tinyurl.com/customcards
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2012, 07:01 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Lemke View Post
Steve . . .

Red Man wasn't in a pouch in the early 1950s, it was a cardboard box. The card was attached by a waxy paper outer wrapper.
Cardboard pouch, eh? Afraid I haven't seen any that survived. Only saw the cards back then because my chewing father tossed them my way. Thanks Bob.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2012, 11:18 PM
Gary Dunaier's Avatar
Gary Dunaier Gary Dunaier is offline
"Thumbs Down Guy"
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 789
Default

I seem to recall sometime during the 1980s that there was some kind of a REQUIREMENT that card packs include 'something of value' (gum, stickers, puzzle pieces, what have you). For example, Donruss' 1982 product was "puzzle and cards"...



...and I've always wondered why cards couldn't be sold on their own merits, as they are today. (And if this was the case, how was Topps able to get away with selling rack packs which had nothing BUT cards?)
__________________
The GIF of me making the gesture seen 'round the world has been viewed over 412 million times!

Last edited by Gary Dunaier; 02-03-2012 at 11:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:30 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,150
Default Cards +

Not aware of any requirement. From what authority would such a requirement originate ? My assumption has been that the "need" to sell the card with something else was originally market driven, and then came to be expected by that market, and that once Topps established that the "market" expectation was gum, attempts by others to break that expectation did not fare well.

After 1981 when Marvin Miller had helped break the Topps exclusive gum/confections contract, everyone started using gum. Then manufacturers had to find other things to put in the packs to distinguish themselves for those buyers who wanted more than just the cards.

Even during the heart of the Topps monopoly period in the 1960s and early 70s, it often included insert items with cards to help stimulate sales
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-04-2012, 07:03 PM
Volod Volod is offline
Steve
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NEOH
Posts: 1,082
Default

Some very good points, Al. It seems to me that manufacturers have always sought to add some value to their base product by exploiting the popularity of some other cultural phenonmenon, especially if it was free or of little cost to them to do so. For most of the last century that phenomenon was professional sports, and it moved a lot of stuff, including tobacco, gum and candy. It's hard to think of anything more effective to induce an eight to twelve-year-old consumer to buy a product. So, in my view, it has to be the advent of televised sports - and its greater marketability - that marked the point at which the original base product, like gum, became secondary - or maybe even irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-05-2012, 04:45 AM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is offline
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,594
Default Topps had been doing

rack packs for many years before their monopoly ended in 1980. When Fleer and Donruss joined the parade in 1981, all three companies had gum in their packs. Topps sued and won to be the only company that could insert gum.

Thus the other companies looked for other items to enhance their card sales. That was not a legal requirement, rather a corporate decision to try to compete with Topps.

Eventually those "enhancement" evolved into insert cards and then went from there into what we have today. If you think of "insert" cards, in realit y they are just pack enhancements on steroids.

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-05-2012, 06:50 AM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Klein View Post
rack packs for many years before their monopoly ended in 1980. When Fleer and Donruss joined the parade in 1981, all three companies had gum in their packs. Topps sued and won to be the only company that could insert gum.

Thus the other companies looked for other items to enhance their card sales. That was not a legal requirement, rather a corporate decision to try to compete with Topps.

Eventually those "enhancement" evolved into insert cards and then went from there into what we have today. If you think of "insert" cards, in realit y they are just pack enhancements on steroids.

Rich
Good point Rich. What I wonder is when did the base cards become obsolete so only the "insentive insert" is what most people buy the packs for?

If you go on the assumption that the chase cards were the insert insentives it seems that card collecting has reverted back to its original origins. Buy a product with the insert to be the primary insentive to purchase more.
Drew
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whats the point of the SMR? JoeyF Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 20 01-16-2012 05:34 AM
1908 Yale vs. West Point Photograph - Auction Ends Sunday June 6 @ 9PM EST IronHorse2130 Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. 2 06-06-2010 01:57 PM
1910 Toronto-Hanlan's Point Post Card For Sale : DixieBaseball Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 1 12-26-2009 09:27 AM
At what point do qualifiers affect a grade? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 05-22-2008 11:46 AM
Leap of Faith -- what is YOUR jumping off point Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 11-14-2007 10:36 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.


ebay GSB