It would be interesting to see all the data on miscuts grouped by back category. It seems many of the apparent SP's were multiple prints on specific sheets, but with lower overall population numbers.
I don't know if you'd agree....but I thought that most cards that have a different player next to them (top or bottom) seem to fall in the mid-to-high population levels and any player with the same player next to them, fell in the low ranges. This would indicate a significantly different approach between series.
I worry about any theory that doesn't account for population differences. Bresnahan is much much easier than Wallace...and he comes with the same back set, yet there is a big population difference. Double print in the same group is always a possibility, but not a satisfying one. Stuff to think about I guess.
Keep the theories and discussion going!
|