View Single Post
  #66  
Old 11-28-2018, 08:29 AM
ejharrington ejharrington is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLongley View Post
I’m just pointing out a fact we can all see, but it seems whoever the forger is was submitting to SGC and JSA for the authentication. I haven’t seen a PSA/DNA one pop up yet...not that they aren’t out there to... I’m not a big autograph collector but this is definitely a bad look for those two companies and as I understand it JSA used to do the authentication work for SGC.
In fairness to SGC, they correctly rejected a JSA authenticated autograph. That rejection started all of this discovery in the first place.
Reply With Quote