Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscardtheory
I thought this deserves it's own thread, because it really exposes the mindset of Brent Huigens/PWCC during all this. Not humbled, not empathic, not sympathetic, not helpful, no acceptance, just outright defiance.
In response to a return request based on lack of consumer confidence in PWCC items in light of recent revelations -
"The message boards have many things wrong. This card was not consigned by Gary Moser (just FYI). More importantly It also shows no signs of alteration, and as such this isn’t a card we can directly enforce our return policy.
These boards are out of control in many ways, and are defacing cards for little reason and I’m sorry for this slander against a card you own. If you’d like you can certainly always send the card to PSA for their reconfirmation of the grade and it’s accuracy. Soon we also hope to have a program in place where we can facilitate this review for cards which have been slandered on the boards. If you’d like to check back later this month we hope to have that option in place." - Brent Huigens
These altered cards are "slandered". SLANDERED. Let that wording sink in.
|
I think this leads credence to the idea of Brent NOT having legal counsel. I would assume legal counsel would tell him to stop posting on message boards and freshen him up on the meaning of "slandered" and its usage.
I'm not an attorney but at least know he isn't using that word appropriately