Quote:
Originally Posted by edjs
|
I looked for at least an hour or more and couldn't find this. Thanks!!
And Bruce, thanks for your thoughts too. I think it's probably close to 1870, if not 1870. (Probably hard to tell unless something else is found)
On the outset I thought it might be a year or two earlier too, but now, I think the article shown nails it. I wouldn't think this was a cheap photo, relatively speaking, back in the day.