Thread: Overgraded SGC Ramly
View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-01-2002, 04:20 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Overgraded SGC Ramly
Posted By: Paul

Thanks for the quote from SGC's website. This card certainly fits within SGC's own definition of VG. I just didn't think that "heavy crease(s)" or "pinholes" or a "tear" or "ink" (at least on the front) could ever qualify as VG. I guess SGC just has very strict standards for the high grades, and very loose (but openly stated) standards for the low grades. Of course, that still doesn't explain why that really nice caramel Wagner is a 2.

Reply With Quote