Posted By:
Frank EvanovCarrying this over from the other thread that was locked. As you recall, I questioned Kevin's credentials, his documented experience and the source of his expertise:
from Jim:
"Credentials?--I have read his posts here and on the other board on alterations and he has actually gotten cards past Mike Baker who I consider the best grader in the business."
Those are credentials Jim?? Getting a card past Baker hardly qualifies. And who is to say that this actually happened?
from Jim:
"Just because Kevin is uncomfortable and lets say SGC or PSA grades it doesn't mean the card is altered."
Whoa, hold on now. Isn't that the whole point? Presumably I would be paying Kevin for his "expert opinion" that a card is altered...not for him telling me he's "uncomfortable" with a card. And if he is uncomfortable, you are then saying it doesn't mean the card is altered?
Frank