Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardSimon
Just a couple of points I want to make:
1 - In my opinion the seller of the item should always be responsible for a refund if the item comes into question. The seller has the money from the buyer. The seller hired the authenticator and should bear the ultimate responsibility.
2 - In my opinion this autograph is authentic.
3 - Just to post a second opinion about this autograph, I showed the scan to the best person on the planet on Jackie autographs (in my opinion), he is a private collector with a huge collection of Jackie autographs and his opinion is that he believes the autograph is authentic.
|
Hi Richard:
Assuming that the autograph is real how would you suggest my friend move forward if he wants to sell the item and not confront the AH or JSA?
Is it "ethical" to relist with the "old" LOA as some here have suggested? If so do all AH's resubmit even with a LOA as REA did in this case?
Thanks for your input.
Fred