View Single Post
  #1  
Old 06-22-2019, 07:10 PM
robw1959 robw1959 is online now
Rob
Rob.ert We.ekes
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,299
Default The Superiority of SGC

I just got notified by PWCC that one of my cards purchased from a PWCC auction last November, a 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio, was indeed an altered card, and that they wanted to issue me a refund so that they could take it out of circulation by turning it over to law enforcement. It was originally a PSA 3 (PQ), but just looked too sharp for the assigned grade, so I cracked it out and sent it to SGC. Unfortunately, it came back from SGC as an unholdered card that was deemed to have been trimmed. The card is now in the mail to PWCC so I can be refunded once they have verified that this was the card in question.

My point is this: With PSA's reputation as the most conservative grading company out there, I'm pretty sure that a sizable portion of those altered cards have gone this same route and have eventually ended up in the hands of SGC at some point, yet SGC has yet to be implicated in the slabgate scandal. While I'm sure they have allowed some conserved cards to pass through their process and receive a numerical grade, so far, it doesn't look like the trimmed or recolored cards are getting through like they have passed through those card sieves known as PSA and Beckett. The only conclusion that I can draw is that SGC has superior graders.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scan0001.jpg (58.7 KB, 1410 views)
File Type: jpg scan0002.jpg (75.6 KB, 1419 views)

Last edited by robw1959; 06-22-2019 at 07:11 PM.
Reply With Quote