Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdmtx
Doug,
I am not defending psa at all. But I doubt that any person or entity would make accusations or claims against an opinion based company unless it had PROOF of fraud. If they do so without proof, psa would own them.
Mark
|
Right, and that's what they hide behind, because you can't "prove" what the opinion of another person is.
All they have to do is lie about what their own opinion is, which serves the triple purpose of saving their asses from legal issues, making a boatload of money / business for their company, and ruining the fun of the hobby.
How great is it for the entire business of paying people for their opinions that the first paid opinion was a lie, we know it's a lie, and it's still ignored as a lie.
Barry's comment about "close enough" is aiming in the right direction, but the more to the point - they lie because it makes them money.
Doug