Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
The proposed idea, that there is nothing a seller should do beyond refunding a buyer if they catch the alteration and complain while very specifically rejecting the notion the seller should disclose the alteration in the listing, is 100% the same as Jaimet's claimed policy that was resoundingly mocked.
Obviously other aspects of the cases are completely different and have never been claimed to be the same (GM lists altered cards without disclosure but there is no reason to think they alter them themselves or anything), but this proposed policy to defend Morris declining to ID altered cards after being informed is exactly the same, as claimed.
|
So without examining the card in hand, based solely on a scan...not even a before or after photo comparison, you can state the card offered by the company is altered? Not even possibly cut small by the factory?
Again, there is nothing here that at all that rises to the indiscretions that Will has engaged in with this hobby.