I strongly agree with Fudd's takes for the most part. He wants what is best for the hobby and is quite vocal/unique in the way he expresses himself. But I do think the name-calling and cursing often detracts from the excellent points he makes.
It can be a distraction, and the points could be better articulated without all of the drama. I think the views would hold more water (and would be taken more seriously) if he'd just take it down just a notch. I personally enjoy most of the posts, and am always entertained... But these public forums only possess a certain degree of tolerance
As for the anonymity.... I see both sides. The people who are uncovering the massive fraud/criminal activity do not want their names out there, due to numerous potential ramifications. But full transparency is otherwise a very good policy.