Quote:
Originally Posted by epike3
Wow, fabulous post! I was wondering why some cuts had the left border but not others. Looks like my sheet without the border may fit lower right corner. I didn't anticipate that the sheet was so huge compared to most modern 132-card sheets. Love the backstory on the production process!
How many cards short of putting together a full sheet are we between these two groups of cuts?
Re: So Crispos, I have never seen a So Crispo back for sale; a friend knows I like track and field and kindly give one to me! I wouldn't be surprised if some other back(s) were made that didn't survive or are tucked away in a scrapbook somewhere esp. given how obscure this set is. Looks like the same blue ink for all of the back alternatives to National Licorice so maybe they were printed together in a different batch than National Licorice?
I also have owned, for many years, individual blank-backs of Ewry, Eller, Erickson, Gissing,Irons, Pilgrim, Smithson, Sheridan, Trubenbach. They are professionally cut, so guessing not from this sheet but sales person samples or distributed in very small numbers in products without advertising on the back of the cards. Though couldn't say for sure.
-Ed
|
I'm not sure how many panels shy we are; it's hard to know because the panels without left borders don't all fit together and I can't place a row across far enough to get an idea of the width. I suspect the right side of the sheet was more heavily damaged and not all of it was preserved. The T220 sheet (attached for size scaling, I know it's not track
- there is one panel I do not own, and the bottom left and bottom right corners do not survive) measured 10 cards tall and 20 cards across and are much larger cards. That equals about 50 inches across and 33 inches tall, plus the white borders, making it a little over 52 inches across and 35 inches tall. This sheet may well be different, Brett could have and probably did produce sheets in different sizes for different sets. But it's an idea of the kind of thing this shop was producing at the same time for the same client.
The boxing sheet evidently survived in better condition than the track sheet before the point where it was cut up. There were some tears patched with tape in both groups; I suspect the cutting of the sheet was long ago but considerably after production. The boxing sheet is also a proofing sheet; the design is not quite finished. There is an error on one of the cards that was corrected before any real production ran and they are missing the metallic border. I believe no changes were made between the printing of this E229 sheet and the production press run. This is presumably a final proof sheet; there would be multiple sheets run as changes were made to finalize production. There was probably a T220-1 sheet after the surviving example we have here; I don't think there was for E229. The T220 sheet is dated September 13, 1910. The E229 sheet is probably right around this time, which lines up with the subjects, many of which we know had ATC card project contracts already from T218.
The sheet layout is so oddly random. Subjects aren't grouped together, with partial rows repeated seemingly in a random order. It's different from the evidence for all other ATC sets.
I believe the uncut sheet to be the final proof sheet for E229, rather than one of the other backs. I suspect E229 came first, utilizing the ATC contracts, and then the other backs were done by Brett Litho. either because this set was oddly not covered by the exclusivity deal or because Brett just chose to break it.
Thanks for the sharing the So Crispo, I've only seen like 2 or 3 of them in 20 years and neither was for sale. They've got to be very, very tough. I have some of the E229's and a single Koester's type card.