View Single Post
  #118  
Old 07-08-2007, 04:07 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default SURVEY..is your T206 Joe Doyle a rare variation ?

Posted By: Joe Pelaez

"JOE P

"I said "approximately 10".......I can name 8, and I've heard of a possible 9th.

I don't give out names on this board.

Other reports in the hobby have said as many as 12."."

TED Z

*
*

OK, You don't have to tell the board.

Being that I own the third known Doyle, and being that I once had in my possession two of Dr Koos doctored Doyles ... I've been researching the good and the bad DOYLE's since day 1.

How about sending me the names to compare notes?

You also say that other reports in the hobby, have said as many as 12.

Give us the link to those reports.

I've been researching the Doyle error card since 1987.

You just got turned on to the Doyle one year and a half ago.

The debate you had with Barry Sloat in 2005 is proof of that.

If you want to work with me ... fine.

If you rather side step this ... I WILL UNDERSTAND.

Because, if I see a red flag that's brought on by my research, I will raise that red flag to the top of the mast.

My research since 1987, is NOT based on speculations, suppositions, assumptions or theories.

It's based on happenings and people ... the opposite to the above.

Now this could be a continuation to the 1990 Texas national.
Where Mark Macrae and I wasted our time trying to educate the dealers at that show.
The first one was a dealer from Denver, that for hours refused to believe that he bought a bum Magie, created by Dr Koos, from a dealer from Flint MI at the Texas show.
He got his money back, but what a waste of time.
Before the Texas national, I had already gotten my money back from Dr Koos.
Do to the research i did on him, he saw the wisdom of playing ball with me.
Mark Macrae and I, with the support of Lipset, L. Fritsch, Herman Kaufman, John Tisch and Lemke, went to Texas to warn the business end of the hobby about a malignant growth by the name of Dr Koos, Danny Dubchek.

I gave them his name.
I gave them his MO.
I told them what to look for, without telling all.
No sense telling the Dr how to correct what to look for.
I tried to convince them to go after him, because he wasn't going anywhere.

To make a long story short, the business end was more interested in the Kit Young annual February shindig in Hawaii than fighting off a growing malignant growth in the hobby.
The rest is history, Dr Koos had a ball at the expense of the collectors.

I fought for mine, and got it back. ... But that's me.

Ted, you can start by giving us the link to the other reports in the hobby that have said as many as 12 Doyle's.

There's nothing worse for a researcher than misinformation.
To a brainpicker, it means nothing.

Or you can step away ... Like Texas.


Joe