Sgc
Johnny630- you've completely missed the point. The point is that SGC was
NOT interested in "how well the card would sell" in their holder. Instead,
they were properly interested in atoning for a mistake. I am amazed by
people who continually moan about grading companies and their urge to
one up one another, who then make comments like yours in a public forum.
I gave up on PSA long ago, but SGC comparatively seems to have the best
interest of their consumers in mind on a more consistent basis. Rather than
point to one example of SGC giving a grade you don't like, how about a
coherent explanation of what they are supposed to do, that would somehow
satisfy you? Or is that dreaming an impossible dream? Geesh.
Trent King
|