View Single Post
  #66  
Old 04-15-2013, 12:53 PM
tschock tschock is offline
T@yl0r $ch0ck
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 1,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
Because they have been assigned a numerical grade it opens the door wide open to future fraud, deception and theft....I know REA is doing what they can to inform the buyer, but these cards should not be sold in these holders.
OK so far, you've offered 2 solutions to stop them from being sold in these holders.

1 ) REA should refuse to sell them. Fine, REA can do that, but do you honestly think no one else will sell them? Especially if the INTENT is deceive?

2 ) REA should turn them in to PSA for re-evaluation. Again, REA does not OWN the cards so they can not legally do that without buyer consent.

So the onus still falls squarely on the seller and PSA. REA can do no more than what they are already doing.

They have offered their OPINION on the cards in question, and my guess is, they would have had to get the seller's consent to even do that.

Do you have any other logical options to what REA should do?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120 View Post
Someone profited on this card because they got it for a bargain at REA and flipped it months later.
Thanks for proving your option 1 won't work.
Reply With Quote