Quote:
Originally Posted by dgo71
If my max is $100 and I get bid up to $95 then honestly it doesn't really matter to me who is bidding me up. Sure, the idea of shill bidding sucks but as someone mentioned, proving that is tough and time consuming. I just look at it as I was willing to pay 100 and if I got it for 95 I still got it for less than I would've paid. If it goes for 101 then I keep looking for another in my price range. The problem is people want the item but they also want to get it for a steal. It's hard to have it both ways. While deals can be had if the bidder is patient and savvy, getting an item for well below market value shouldn't be the expectation, especially if the item is drawing significant attention.
|
Look at your maximum bid this way "I will bid $x over the next higher bidder up to a maximum of $XX" with $XX being your bid and $x being the auction increment.
I actually like this better as a buyer than a sealed bid auction where I will always either pay my bid amount or lose the item. This way I can still win an item by outbidding the second highest bidder by a small amount. I wonder what percentage of ebay auctions sell for less than the maximum bid? In other words, say the high bid was $100, but the second highest bid was only $75, then the auction ends at $75+bid increment, not $100, which someone was (supposedly) prepared to pay.