Posted By:
barrysloateSteve- I think Corey and I are trying to make the same point, perhaps worded a little differently.
I don't think this thread is about Jim C. It's about PSA, and whether they are willing to look at these resubmitted cards objectively. That includes three possibilities: 1) bumping a card a half grade or more if it warrants it; 2) leaving the card as is if they deem it was properly graded; 3) knocking it down a half grade or putting it in an Authentic holder if they recognize they made a mistake.
That would be a really valuable service to the hobby, but that's not what this is all about. The new policy rewards their best customers, such as Jim, creates an enormous new revenue stream for the company, and protects PSA's liability as they are under no obligation to ever acknowledge an error. And Corey and I, among others, believe this is unfair.