Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog
It's an easy enough experiment to do. Just get a few hundred raw cards, randomly assign each of them to SGC or PSA, wait for them to come back, enter each of the individual grades, compare the SGC mean to the PSA mean (indepedent samples t-test), voila, you have your answer.
In practice it may reliably go in one direction for some issues and the other way for others, but I'd be interested in the main effect (i.e., who is more lenient on average).
|
You should be able to get a federal grant to fund this experiment.  
__________________
FRANK:BUR:KETT - RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER NUMBER FATHER.
GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH NON-FUNGIBLES
274/1000 Monster Number
Nearly*1000* successful B/S/T transactions completed in 2012-24.
Over 680 sales with satisfied Board members served.
If you want fries with your order, just speak up.
Thank you all.
Now nearly PQ.
|