Quote:
Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector
Funny i just finished the message and a quick google search proves my point..
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/H...ns-5687227.php
The lawsuit is only going forward because there is potential auto insurance out there to pay a judgment that can be in the millions of dollars. (one carrier paid 4 million) If the only pocket was the rescuer there almost certainly would be no lawsuit.
I dont blame someone who is paralyzed to sue a rescuer when insurance covers the incident and no money comes out of the rescuer.
You cant say i dont contribute anything to the forum |
I'm without words..... Wow