Posted By:
warshawlawEveryone who hasn't already figured it out, I did not mean Dan. Sorry.
I can't speak for the others, but I didn't go to see the bat info because I did not have the time or the money to take 2-3 days from my practice w/o compensation. I asked for copies of the information and was refused. Whether or not the bat is what it was initially claimed to be is an old debate on a non-card matter and I'm not going to rehash it, but since you bring it up, I think O'Keefe's articles were right on the money in terms of reporting the issues from both sides of what was a debatable issue for the biggest experts in the area of equipment collecting. I hate to drop names, but here is a portion of one of the articles: "Marshall Fogel, a prominent collector from Denver, says it all comes down to how you interpret the data: "There's no question it's debatable. It just depends on what side you want to fall on it. Louisville Slugger made the choice to believe the bat is real," says Fogel."