Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
It all depends how you do the analysis. David's methodology seems to assume one is buying a randomly selected card. He may be right on that premise but I am not sure it's a meaningful way to look at it. Iif the inquiry is framed as Ted frames it then yes obviously the risk of buying a high end card is at least somewhat higher in PWCC. I would quibble with exponentially though.
|
Quite. Exponentially is almost certainly the wrong word (has the risk doubled with each successive month PWCC has been in business? or tripled each year?), but then, I don't see many people other than mathematicians using it correctly these days.