View Single Post
  #148  
Old 06-05-2019, 09:18 AM
70ToppsFanatic 70ToppsFanatic is offline
Dave K.leppel
member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
I am also guessing anyone without clear before and after evidence is facing an uphill battle on a review.
Not sure that PSA has anything to gain by creating such a hurdle. They have a better option available. I think they could just give guarantee reviews the lowest priority such that they take a long time. With normal services already running 3 months and longer it would discourage such submissions.

I think their focus is to protect themselves in such a way that also maximizes the value of the items they have authenticated that are already out in the market. They know that as long as the vast majority of owners of their authenticated items don’t get hurt then they will be ok.

I doubt you will ever see any of PSA’s submission records voluntarily provided to produce a list of potentially affected items. You won’t see them acknowledge any shortfalling on their part either. They are playing this one just like the previous ones.
Reply With Quote