View Single Post
  #6  
Old 09-01-2017, 08:40 AM
pitchernut's Avatar
pitchernut pitchernut is offline
Jim
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 775
Default

I agree that the above M116 should not have been labeled "Long" Tom Hughes but should read Tom Hughes. It is the same Tom Hughes (I think) as is my C-46 Hughes who threw a no-no for Boston Braves. What I was hoping for is the M116 showing him playing for Boston and not Rochester.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1527.jpg (52.5 KB, 56 views)
__________________
Was collecting Next day newspaper article and earliest rookie ephemera/card of all 20th century no hit hurlers.

Last edited by pitchernut; 09-01-2017 at 08:43 AM.
Reply With Quote