[Archive]

Posted By: Kevin Cummings

It was one of the earliest topics on this board and Bob Lemke was involved in the thread. At that time, he was not hot on the idea of listing the variations to the minutest detail as he did last time ("New York" vs. "New Yorks", for example) and I agree with that position.

But I also agree that there is a need to list significant variations and poses and years are among them. Jay could speak more intelligently on whether one pose variation over another within a given year would command any kind of premium and whether it would be worth while to try to value poses differently. That was not done in the last listing.