[Archive]

Posted By: davidcycleback

Assuming you could receive a refund from the original buyer: When the card was returned
as 'trimmed' would you want to return the card for a refund (presumably due to you felt the card
was worth less money or because you aesthetically didn't want a 'tainted' card)? If you
answer is yes, then you would necesarilly have to disclose that it was rejected.

The second queston is: Is the card trimmed or not trimmed? If the card is not
trimmed and the card is known to be untrimmed, there's no requirement to
disclose known erroneous opinions on the card. People pull cards straight from
wax packs, and know that the card is not trimmed. If I'm selling a 1976 Cranes
Disc Walter Payton Rookie, I'm not required to disclose that my four year old
daughter said it was a cookie. I can if I want, but I'm not required.