I don't think the seller needs to defend himself. A deal is a two part system. The seller gives goods to a buyer for an agreed upon compensation (usually a dollar figure).
Once the seller sells the agreed upon item and delivers it safely to the seller, his part of the deal is done.
In this case, it seems like there were good pictures of the item and there was not any misleading descriptions or fuzzy pictures.
The seller does not have to defend themselves, it seems like he held up his half of the transaction.
|