[Archive]

Posted By: mark s.

thank you for coming here to discuss your card.
i'm extremely curious and having difficulty understanding how creases on the front, which are SO severe that the paper is actually BROKEN, can be "only ever so slightly" evident on the reverse...
and why is the back SO bright... is that really an accurate image of the reverse (no stains or toning)?
do YOU think gai got this one right... does this card appear to be COMPLETELY unaltered to you?
would you be willing to guarantee the winner that it will receive a numeric grade from sgc and/or psa?
very interesting card... thanks again for your help.