View Single Post
  #23  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:31 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy

Posted By: leon

Mark has said, to me, that since no less than 6 experts have opined the card is not real, that he doesn't want the card regardless of paper/ink testing. I have also told Steve, this morning or last night via email, that I wouldn't want to buy a card that all of those experts have said is fake, unless it can be proven it was actually printed circa 1930. Since, without other evidence, it's impossible, I wouldn't want to buy the card. Would anyone on the board want to buy the card even if it was tested to have 1930's ink and 1930's cardstock given the written letters, and other opinions we know of, about this card? Like I have said all along... If it were a real 1930 card I would love to have it...I don't see this thread getting deleted unless I hear more overwhelming, convincing arguments why it should be. Brian M. and myself try very hard to make this as open a forum as possible. best regards

Reply With Quote