View Single Post
  #31  
Old 11-23-2004, 11:44 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default 1914 Cracker Jack set

Posted By: Morrie

"Also - for what it is worth - I find it curious that this board is so easy to jump on an anti-PSA bandwagon when any vintage HOF star in 9 or better shows up in a PSA holder, but nary a question is raised against SGC..."

What kind of questions would you like raised? Somebody over on the PSA boards jokingly asked if they were bleached, and someone else suggested they were fake (cards, scans, or both). Having never seen the cards, I can't say. The pictures are beautiful, but I don't know enough about CJs in general to assess their authenticity from the scans.

I guess I'm just confused what SGC (and Mastro, I suppose) has done here that makes you think we ought to be concerned. I thought at first that you might be referring to some kind of double-standard. That didn't make sense to me, though, since there's really no reason based on the provenance of the cards or SGC's history to question their grading. Which makes me think you might know something we don't.

So, what do you know that should make us want to question them?

Morrie

Reply With Quote