Another collectors advise---Quote: Don't let the insults bother you!- You have a perfect right to be objective about your photo. Stick with the Facts!
If there is going to be a study of any antique portrait photo and one wants to compare the ear and stop because one ear may not appear to be a perfect fit when matching against another photo, is this a logical concept. Wouldn't it be fair to mention the antique photo's ear comparison may appear a little different, so there for not positively definitive.
Shouldn't any photo comparison theory greatly depend on each of a photo's factors--lighting, head positions, clarity, line of sight, age, condition of photo, the photographers process & touch-up, all the above, etc.
The Ear discussion is fine, but what about a overall point system.
Nose-----Mouth----hair-line---Eyes,---. Comparing two photos made around the same time, etc and other related facts.
A Ear comparison of my Lapham would be interesting.
So look, which ear might you pick for comparison?--to be fair my Comiskey is the fifth from the left--
Last edited by Directly; 01-27-2024 at 06:17 AM.
|