Posted By:
MarkI think the winner of the MHCC card could get pretty far asserting that either:
(i) MHCC didn't "thoroughly research" the card's population (a material misrepresenation) (heck, if MHCC had merely posted an inquiry on this forum, a poster would have told them there was at least one other T5 Jackson); or
(ii) MHCC must have known there was more than one such card (fraud) (e.g., find a T5 collector who would testify that "all respected T5 collectors know there is more than one Jackson out there").
I'm not saying MHCC did anything wrong, and I know little about T5s, but I can see it coming down to a battle of the experts and the winner would only need to prove (i) or (ii) by a preponderence of the evidence.