[Archive]

Posted By: Pennsylvania Ted

Its your prerogative not to agree with my observations on the T206 structure. I referred you to Scot Reader's analysis.
Yet, for whatever reason (that I'm not sure I understand) you appear to to be a contentious critic. The fact that you
do not want to accept that the 6 super prints were originally designed as "350-only" cards is your problem.

Anyhow, I waiting for some logical alternatives from you regarding the overall T206 printing arrangement ?

I think the series "numbers" favor my contention that this set was printed in multiples of 12. I have discussed this with
others; and, they consider my observation to have some merit.

TED Z