View Single Post
  #15  
Old 12-02-2015, 03:53 PM
jb67 jb67 is offline
D@v!d W@tk!n$
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason.1969 View Post
In my narrow view, a great baseball card should have a cool picture or two--photo or artistic, name/position/team on the front, and ideally even stats on the back. That's a bias I had for a really long time, and it pushed me away from a lot of the older sets.

When I finally decided it was time to own a DiMaggio earlier this year, the voice of the pocketbook out-screamed my biases, and I "settled" for the 1939 Play Ball--with no name, no team, and no stats. To my pleasant surprise, I ended up really, really liking the simplicity of the card, and of course Joe D's face is so familiar and distinct that one hardly needs to see a name.

Well, I can now add to the Joe D. his teammate and a key card for my Top 100 display in progress. And even with no name, team, or stats, I am thinking 1939 PB is THE coolest Dickey of them all.

73 down...27 to go!

Attachment 213646
Jason, that Dickey is another beauty. You are on real hot streak picking up some outstanding pre-war cards that look great. Keep it going.
Reply With Quote