[Archive]

Posted By: Chad

However, this information doesn't need to be published in a traditional sense. If Jay and Gil can post this stuff on the web and if they're willing to accept criticism and advice on their work in order to refine it and make it more acceptable to the majority of collectors--and there's no reason to think they aren't--then who cares if it makes it onto the carcass of a dead tree. As long as WE all know what's being referred to, the publisher can take a leap. In fact, this wouldn't be a bad feature to add to the Old Cardboard site. In fact, it would be an awesome feature to add.

I do agree that we don't need to reinvent the wheel as regards to current ACC designations. I imagine most of the UNC sets will fit under an already existing designation. If they don't, then go ahead and make one up and we'll all argue about it until we get some semblance of consensus. Fellas, the more I think about this, the more fun it sounds. It would be like the exceptional EPDG thread only moreso. Excellent!

--Chad