Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyElm
Yes, you said it. I read the book a couple of months ago and it painted a picture of a (very?) intelligent guy, but most, if not all, of the spy stuff seemed anecdotal at best. Over and over again the author asserted that no one really knew what he was up to at any given time, so I came to the conclusion that his spycraft was possibly more incidental than anything else. Perhaps I am 'misremembering,' but when he made films of Tokyo during the baseball tour there, for instance, he wasn't sent to do that, right? Wasn't it years later, after Pearl Harbor, when he said something to the effect of, "Wait, I have some films from years ago showing the landscape of Tokyo that our guys might be able to use."???
|
The Tourist Was A Spy
History majors who use cinema as source material for their theses are _________.
To describe Berg as enigmatic is perhaps an understatement based on the book.
Will his portrayal in the film be accurate? Hardly, but most who see the film will not have read the book or care.