[Archive]

Posted By: identify7

If board members were not involved, the current status could be described as a seller (in the view of the buyer) has misrepresented his merchandise. Possession of the card and materials of transmission are evidence of that.

If you return the card to a seller believed to be behaving fradulently, it does not make sense; what would then motivate him to return your money? Honesty?

Of course, this does not apply here, imho.

What do you think?