#23 Report Post
Unread Today, 10:34 AM
Fred's Avatar
Fred Fred is offlineFred
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,015
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post
Probably why they no longer give them a numerical grade is the fact that most of the non-square frame subjects which are the only true blank back T204's are in fact early two-part cards that had the front and back adhered to each other and separated later in life due to moisture or damp environments. These early two-part cards are very scarce.
Most collectors are unaware of the two-part T204's and often buy these "blank back" cards thinking they are a scarce error when in fact they are not. Again, Anderson, Bancroft, Bransfield, Burkett, Dineen and Moran can and do come with blank backs and were made that way. If one had one of these blank backs and one of the supposed blank backs in hand they will find a difference in stock thickness.
Scott, not that clarification is necessary, but would a "thinner" blank back T204 be like a skinned OJ?
That's great information! Thank you!
As to value, perhaps similar to an AUT card. As to appearance, the back will be smooth, as these T204's were two parts put together, but the two pieces easily separated over time it seems.
Here is an example of the two-part cards
https://www.brockelmanauctions.com/T...-LOT17081.aspx