Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss
Fully agree. I have been looking at this card and have decided to pass because of the paper loss. I believe the AH is saying that the actual grade given is higher than/inconsistent with what other cards with this type of paper loss normally grade out to. I do not think they are intending to say it would grade higher but for the paper loss. Its a cover ass statement and, frankly, a refreshing, honest disclosure
|
Ditto. Seen it and walked right past it. It would be a 5 if it had the paper. It doesn't, it is not a 5. They are down playing the severity of it. It should be a 2, but it obviously would command more dollars than a 2.
Neither was 'tick mark' in PWCCs auction a few months ago which is their way of saying there is a deep puncture in the card that pulled the paper up and it is almost gone. I am passing also.