Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
Did Kevin tell you the ball was that old, or did you assume the ball was that old? That part of your story isn't quite clear.
If he told you that, yes you deserve a refund because it was misrepresented. If you assumed that, then you should have done more research.
|
Hey David,
He told me that. And then when I told him that Brandon said it wasn't from when he said it was, he said that Brandon doesn't know what he is talking about, I to quote his response "Whoever told you that was worth $75 he's totally wrong the ball is not from the 19 thirties there is a later model of the same type with different type faces that is not as early as that one"
To which Brandon replied to me "Comical, "there's a later model that looks the same"...The stuff these guys come up with. Tell him you talked to me, and show him this image. This is not opinion, this is research and fact."